Movements, part 4: People and time A humanist model of people in a snap Angela Madsen

  • Move Frontmatter
    Open Frontmatter

    © 2025, Angela Madsen All rights reserved.

    For Violet.

    This book was written by a human mind with no AI assistance at any point in the process.

    All confabulation is my own. All research gaps are my own. All interpretive thinking is my own. Annotations are the best I could manage with the timescapes involved, and will be continued to be worked for a while.

    Three Buckminster Fuller structures are used in the Systems flow page; Manoogian & Benson's Cognitive Bias Codex is used on the Cognitive bias page; otherwise all images are created myself using either Affinity Design or sketching in Concept. This book has been through multiple versions, multiple software, and multiple structures through the five years I worked on articulating it. Tools have included Ulysses, Powerpoint, and Affinity Publisher.

    Frontmatter 132 words
  • Move People have a complex relationship with time
    Open People have a complex relationship with time

    People have a complex relationship with time

    This moment is rarely only this moment

    relationship.png

    A stick figure walking a horizon of 'this existential moment', which is overlayed on three boxes: memory, present, and goal. Nodes are behind the figure: completed actions. Nodes with dashed outlines are in front of the figure: possibilities. Underlaying it all: people in a snap.

    As we move in this moment — even if it’s as ‘simple’ and ‘easy’ as taking a step, grasping an object, or saying a simple word — we are leveraging a mix of memory (past/orientation), environment (present/findability), and goal (future/navigation).

    • **Taking a step: **remembering the mechanics and physical interplay, noting the rough surface here, understanding that the
    People have a complex relationship with time 743 words
  • Move Non-memory history: tools
    Open Non-memory history: tools

    Non-memory history: tools

    People leveraging objects from outside the snap

    non-memory.png

    Building on the previous diagram. A vertical spectrum node (with rectangles instead of circles) is to the left of memory, labels "objects of history". The top node is "robust", and the bottom node is "transient". Gray-filled nodes have been added behind the figure, which represent non-memory leveraged history.

    We don’t have to dig that far into our histories to find when the only information we have are things left by those who came before: paths (which could also be non-human fauna), buildings, furniture, pots, clothing. As time continued it’s trudge forward, we added writing: our first information technology.

    These are all tools. Tool are embedded with implici

    Non-memory history: tools 737 words
  • Move Managing our cognitive load
    Open Managing our cognitive load

    Managing our cognitive load

    Keep on keeping on

    keeping on.png

    Buidling on the previous diagram. Black-filled nodes have been added behind the figure, representing completed future-sensed tasks. One of those have been linked with a blue line to a series of black-outlined "keep on keeping on" nodes that reaches into the future.

    When we figure out something that works, we keep it and play it over and over again – process, behavior, reaction, a good tool, anything that seems to get the results we want. Many of us don’t even reconsider the results.

    We keep on keeping on. Do it often enough, and it becomes habit. Do it long enough, and it can become a stability point — something that, if touched and attempted (or actually!) moved by another, can cause an u

    Managing our cognitive load 487 words
  • Move Ideation
    Open Ideation

    Ideation

    People outside the snap

    ideation.png

    Building on the previous diagram. An extra box labeled "recalibration" and outlined in purple has been added to the right of "goal". The blue line has shifted to purple, and an additional trail starting in the immediate forward motion has been added. The node at the end of the connective lines has been shifted to gray-filled with a dashed outline, representing registered possibility. Another substrate has been added underneath "people in a snap", widened to include recalibration and labeled "people in ideation".

    We play in the future all the time

    Part of living in the now is that things continue to happen around us. Putin goes to war, ten ads try to take your mental space, someone falls down, someone ge

    Ideation 417 words
  • Move Building towards the future
    Open Building towards the future

    Building towards the future

    People outside the snap

    building.png

    Building on the previous diagram. Recalibration outline becomes black, and the recalibration line has disappeared. A box has been added to the right of recalibration, labeled "reality changing" and outlined in yellow. A yellow throughline, starting from a different inception, completed future-sense node and skipping through to a large registered possibility, has been traced. Another substrate has been added, scoping from objects of history to reality changing, labeled 'people building'.

    We are in the constant and irrevocable process of stepping into the future, and we are always making bets on it and building towards it.

    Anything we build is intended to shift something in the future.

    Building towards the future 508 words
  • Move The ouruborus of perception
    Open The ouruborus of perception

    The ouruborus of perception

    Sense making is filtered through a perceiving mind

    This process impacts all understanding.

    People are individually complex — we are beings of networked, stratified, and variable processing. That processing affects the data we see, the filters we apply, the patterns and processes we develop, and the outcomes of our cogitation.

    When we are moving through the world, our reference point is in multiple dimensions: the physical environment, our physical and emotional state, and time are the most prevalent. To get to from point A to point B, you have to navigate the physical interchanges. To navigate those points, you are experiencing time — which, depending on the context and the points in question, could shift the points as you are moving between them. And during all this, you could be focused and attentive, you could be distracted, you could be daydreaming about a potential happening, or crying over something that already happened. These are aspects of our environm

    The ouruborus of perception 620 words
  • Move The ouruborus of perception
    The ouruborus of perception
  • Move We function into the future every day
    Open We function into the future every day

    We function into the future every day

    Our relationship with time

    Think about any person attending to their work. Assume this entailed, at least this one day, a commute. Maybe it was a standard commute, maybe they had a meeting in New York and they live in LA.

    They got to work, probably on time. They ate at some point in the past few days (probably even this morning) so they aren’t distracted from the problem solving of their work. They already have plans in play about what they need to pick up on the way home, what chores have to be done sooner than later, and the various bits that they know they need to do to maintain their specific health. That health could be physical, emotional, social — this person is juggling the full environmental factors we discussed in the previous movement.

    We know this because they are here, now, meeting at least the expectation of attendance. That means that they’ve already thought about the future well enough to survive to this moment in time. They are doing this

    We function into the future every day 628 words
  • Move We live through time physically
    Open We live through time physically

    We live through time physically

    Our relationship with time

    through.png

    Returning to our stick figure moving through this existential moment. The recalibration and reality-changing lines are showing, and all the boxes underneath "this existential moment" are black.

    Yesterday, today, and tomorrow

    Physically, we cannot shift in time. We are tethered to this moment, even as this moment is an everchanging progress point being logged into the universe and rippling out to affect the potentials-states of an ever-expanding group of living beings.

    Squash a roach, and maybe the next person (cohabitor, neighbor, future-occupant) won’t be startled. Or maybe that roach is part of a larger whole working to create a new civilization/infestation and you thwarte

    We live through time physically 423 words
  • Move We live in time mentally
    Open We live in time mentally

    We live in time mentally

    Our doing is anchored to now, but our mind is not constrained to it


    We be.

    we be.png

    Three boxes of varying lenth. A blue-filled box is long, and labeled "past". A small blue-outlined, white-filled box is labled "present", and our stick figure has one leg lifted and about to step on it. There is a small gap, and then a longer yellow box labeled "future".

    Existentially, we live in all time.

    We leverage memories — the past — to inform the present and the future. We live in the present, inundated with countless data points that we are constantly sifting through to try to make sense of our reality. We sense the future — signaled by fear and desire — and try to avoid what alarms us, and grab what intrigues us.


    We live in time mentally 604 words
  • Move Creating novel future states
    Open Creating novel future states

    Creating novel future states

    Thinking and talking about a thing is not the same as materializing it

    novel.png

    Our stick figure is on a time horizon of past-present-future. Nodes of completed future-sense tasks and keep-on-keeping-on tasks are scattered over the past. The stick figure now has a perceptive eye and cognitive cloud filled with bubbles of internalized experience. Above the time horizon, the figure is moving with vector force to keep-on-keeping-on tasks nested within registered possibility.
    The cognitive cloud has a dashed-line vector aimed below the time horizon to ideation.
    Ideation has two vector forces coming out of it: one, simply, down to building. The other is going to the right to interact as a variable complexity with thinking, expressing,

    Creating novel future states 274 words
  • Move Creating novel future states
    Creating novel future states
  • Move Links to full book
    Open Links to full book

    Movements is a book in six parts

    Part 1: Introduction

    Part 2: Information

    Part 3: Who-ness

    Part 4: People and time

    Part 5: Fractal implications

    Part 6: Appendix


    Anyone interested in defraying costs, buying me a coffee for my expertise/time, or otherwise supporting me are welcome to do so via a pay-what-you-want model.

    An email drop has been set up at movements. I have no idea what my cadence for checking it will be, or how done I'll get how fast with the inevitable spam and trolls. It's still the best way to potentially get in touch with

    Links to full book 114 words